Grief Doesn't Follow a Schedule: Rethinking the "Stages of Grief"
The five stages of grief — denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance — were developed by Elisabeth Kübler-Ross to describe how dying patients related to their own mortality, not a universal checklist everyone grieving a loss is supposed to move through in order. Even Kübler-Ross herself later said the stages were never meant to be linear or complete.
Where the five stages actually came from
Kübler-Ross introduced the model in 1969, based on interviews with terminally ill patients about their own approaching death — not with people grieving the loss of someone else. The model was later popularly extended to bereavement in general, well beyond its original, narrower context, and that extension is where much of the confusion comes from.
Why "I'm not doing this right" is such a common — and misplaced — worry
Because the five stages became so widely known, many grieving people quietly measure themselves against a script: am I past denial yet, should I be angrier, why haven't I reached acceptance. Grief researchers, including Kübler-Ross herself, have been explicit that stages can be skipped, revisited, experienced simultaneously, or not experienced in any particular order at all. Feeling "behind schedule" isn't a sign you're grieving wrong — it's a sign the schedule was never accurate to begin with.
What grief researchers actually think happens instead
More recent models — such as the dual process model developed by Margaret Stroebe and Henk Schut — describe grief as an oscillation between loss-oriented coping (confronting the pain and reality of the loss directly) and restoration-oriented coping (attending to practical life, distraction, moving forward), rather than a fixed sequence. People move back and forth between these modes, sometimes within the same day, for as long as it takes — which is highly individual and not predictable from the outside.
What this means practically
- There's no "correct" timeline. Grief that looks different from a friend's, a family member's, or what a book described isn't wrong — it's simply yours.
- Setbacks aren't regression. Returning to intense grief months or years later, sometimes triggered by something small, is normal, not a sign you failed to process it the first time.
- You're allowed to function and grieve simultaneously. Restoration-oriented moments — laughing, working, planning — don't mean you've stopped grieving or loved the person less.
When to seek support
Most grief, however non-linear, gradually becomes more bearable over time on its own. Support is worth seeking specifically when grief feels stuck rather than shifting — persistent inability to function months in, intense guilt that won't ease, or a sense that the loss has fundamentally derailed your ability to engage with life at all.
If grief is sitting heavier than you expected, or longer than feels survivable, it's worth talking to someone — there's no "too late" or "too early" to start.
Learn about individual therapy →Prefer email? katia.tandon@gmail.com